Ishmael
Reed’s Mumbo Jumbo describes a fight
between proponents of Jes Grew and the Atonists. The book itself is a rebellion
against Atonist conventions of what novels should be, violating conventions
left and right. The title page comes after chapter one. After finishing chapter
52, the reader finds another chapter 52. Typos litter the text. In some places,
the placement of the letters on the page looks like it was printed badly (e.g.
the word “astrologer” midway through page 16). In any traditional book, these
things would be considered errors and be corrected before publication.
It’s also a
recurring theme that Jes Grew cannot be controlled by Atonism. The Talking
Android plan assumes that the Atonists can find some person who can speak for
Jes Grew, but that’s not how it works. Jes Grew cannot be pinned down as a
single idea, preventing it from being exploited by the narrow-minded Atonists.
When Safecracker Gould tries to distill Jes Grew into his poem “Harlem Tom-Toms”,
he just writes bad poetry. Even more damning is that the Atonists listening in
the room don’t realize it’s just bad poetry until PaPa LaBas bursts in and
exposes Gould. Actual Jes Grew is incompatible with Atonist ways of thinking.
But that whole message is undermined by a dependent clause on the back
cover: “Cited by literary critic Harold Bloom as one of the five hundred most
significant books in the Western canon…” The list, available online, does
indeed contain five hundred works of literature and Mumbo Jumbo is one of them. But so are six works by John Milton,
who is explicitly cited in Mumbo Jumbo
as an Atonist apologist. Despite his best efforts, Reed’s novel has been absorbed
into Atonist literary criticism.
I think Mumbo Jumbo was written with Atonist literary critics specifically in mind. Many of the purposeful breaks in convention and arguments seem to be targeted specifically towards them. I don't think it's failure that "Reed's novel has been absorbed into Atonist literary criticism", but rather a success.
ReplyDeleteI agree mostly with Adi that Reed likely meant his book for the Atonist literary critics. In this way, I think he definitely succeeded. On the other hand, a list that includes Milton's work is not something that he would want his book to apear on. I think it's only a partial success. He can get out his message, but it isn't fully understood or accepted if people don't use the ideas in the book to reevaluate their own beliefs.
ReplyDelete